Instead of placing the filmstrip navigation below the main working window, it runs vertically down the left side of the preview window. Corel aftershot pro 3 basics tutorial download#.Corel aftershot pro 3 basics tutorial software#.Corel aftershot pro 3 basics tutorial for mac#.AfterShot Pro 3 and Lightroom are image-editing software. And looking at the many different ones out there, it’s easy to see how they both fall into one of two groups. There are the heavy hitters, who have all the advanced tools but a slower workflow. Photoshop and Capture One are great examples of these. They process images faster than a butterfly moves but lack the more complex post-processing tools. Corel’s AfterShot Pro 3, Adobe Lightroom and ON1 Photo RAW fall into this category. The lightweights go for speed rather than advanced editing. I prefer a faster workflow compared to more complex adjustments, too.īecause of this, the main competitors of AfterShot Pro 3 are Adobe Lightroom, ON1 Photo RAW, Darktable and Rawtherapee. Although, the first three have introduced some more advanced features you find in Photoshop like masks and layers, and the last two listed are free. In the end, you may possibly use both types of programs. You might use the heavyweights for layers, masks, focus stacking and other complex edits.
Corel aftershot pro 3 tutorial software#
And you can use lightweight software like AfterShot Pro 3 and Lightroom for culling and local adjustments. On AfterShot’s website, there is a comparison of AfterShot Pro 3 against Lightroom CC and Lightroom 6. You can see quickly what AfterShot gives you, and where Lightroom fails. But its information is a bit outdated.Īlso, Lightroom CC is not necessarily the direct competitor of AfterShot Pro 3. I see it as the basic, beginner’s version of Lightroom, based around their mobile app. Lightroom CC is meant to give mobile and tablet-based photo editors access to desktop editing.
So, Aftersthot is comparing themselves to a basic and inferior product. If AfterShot Pro 3 were to compare themselves to any program, it should be Lightroom Classic. They perhaps didn’t do this, because their product doesn’t hold up so well to the fuller version. They also make a comparison to Lightroom 6 to compare perpetual licenses. The problem with comparing yourself to Lightroom is that it forces the new editing software to copy and act in the same vein. COREL AFTERSHOT STANDARD 3 TUTORIAL SOFTWARE Why not concentrate on an engine that focuses on something different or better? With AfterShot Pro 3, it’s a little too similar. I understand the main benefit of AfterShot is that it is much faster than Lightroom. If this is your first entrance into photo editing software, you might like the interface. There are many things I find that don’t fit well.īut I find the interface not as attractive or easy on the eyes as its competitors. Number one is they left the Windows-style folder icons and colours in the File System on the left. They are horrible and distracting.Īt the very least, they need to be muted, or, even better, adapted to fit into the same theme as the program. Adobe Lightroom created its own icons, which are not over the top. I feel like Aftershot 3 Pro was a little lazy here. The file system itself works, but it’s very basic. The next thing I find distracting is the terrible colours at the top of the window interface. These colours are labels and can be added to your images to separate in your culling or selection process. They don’t need to be so over the top though. It is supposed to bring your eye to the ‘Get More’ Modular Camera Profiles, but why? Next is that red star icon in the middle of the far-right of the interface window. This isn’t the most important area to draw your attention to. Camera Profiles aren’t as useful as the exposure slider or are so hidden that it needs to be pointed out. Unlike Lightroom and On1 Photo RAW which use modules, AfterShot Pro 3 uses tabs. There aren’t so many they become confusing.
0 kommentar(er)
